An early Christmas gift in the gallery

[Guest]

Okay.

I remember I asked about other fetishes? See I like lots of other stuff and am not a true fetishist for fur in itself. I like the women in fur, and other stuff too. I think this is fairly normal.

 

So I do not understand why so many erotic image makers get it wrong.

Glamour is far more intereting than hardcore stuff.

 

But never have I never come across a series of pictures that takes into account everything in the list just about, and in such a fun, glossy, well done way.

 

So imagine. A bathtub in the snow. A beautiful raven haired dom female in a leather basque gloves stockings and thigh boots, topless. in the bath are a leopard coat, a black mink with white fox, an indigo and mink and some other furs. Then sharing the bathtub is a stunning younger redhead who is between the dommes legs licking the heel of her thigh boot begging for a puff on her cigarette, which she finally goves her in the second pic, and she looks like she is having an orgasm as she french inhales. The younger one too is in thigh boots and leather.

 

When I did the word search it read:

 

black mink indigo white silver fox leopard smoking leather gloves bdsm femdom lesbian thighboots boots gloves corset stockings heels

 

Now my question:

 

WHERE THE HELL IS THIS FROM I WANT TO JOIN!!!!!

[Guest]

sorry folks. They were deleted due to my complete stupidity when it comes to technical stuff. Anyway I can't resize them as I didn't save the link and I am not going through 25 000 pictures again.

 

Anyway here is a link to something completely different and special for Worker.

 

BUT DON'T GO HERE AS IT IS A BITMAP IF YOU ARE NOT ON BROADBAND it may turn you to stone or something.

 

Link removed. wallee.

 

oh and yeah it has some nudity and the fur is a bear. ....but fun.....I'd say his name was big ted.

[MadameTR]

WHERE THE HELL IS THIS FROM I WANT TO JOIN!!!!!

 

Sounds like the Lily Xene Leg Show pictorial from around 1992 IIRC. Not a bad photo set but the scans circulating are rather poor quality.

[Guest]

That's a shame. Funny if they are that old that they hjaven't been seen before.

 

YOU HAVE REMOVED THE TEDDY BEAR LINK????? WHY???? A teddy with a dildo is offensive? WTF???

 

Okay it may not be real fur but we do have some teddy bear fans here and I just thought they may find it funny.

[LordTheNightKnight]

That's a shame. Funny if they are that old that they hjaven't been seen before.

 

YOU HAVE REMOVED THE TEDDY BEAR LINK????? WHY???? A teddy with a dildo is offensive? WTF???

 

Okay it may not be real fur but we do have some teddy bear fans here and I just thought they may find it funny.

 

I know we have teddy bear fans, but not those kinds of fans. Since stuffed animals are associated with childhood, that kind of pic is indirect borderline pedophelia.

[Ravens8]

Since stuffed animals are associated with childhood

 

Any comments Worker? I know my bear would be most offended if he thought I still associated him with childhood. In fact hold on!.... Christmas? adult toys for a bear? ah! gift problem solved. Thanks guys

 

Haven't seen the pic so may be talking out of turn. But it's individuals who make associations. Things do not have an inherrent association as part of their reality.

 

It gets onto dangerous ground

 

Shouldn't use axes (associated with murderers)

Police shouldn't use handcuffs ( associated with slavery)

Shouldn't show indulgent chocolate ads (associated with obese people)

Shouldn't use ethically reared furs (associated with some Eastern fur farms)

Shouldn't do anything that might affect another country (our great great great grandchildren might have to apologise to them one day)

 

Ok OK that last one doesn't quite fit in, But had to get it in, and I'm sure you can all find better examples (Got there fur one in anyway to keep it on topic!!)

 

This is of course all somewhat tongue in cheek. But in this crazy mixed up world we find ouselves living in, who knows where the ocean ends and the land begins in the fog !

[Guest]

 

YOU HAVE REMOVED THE TEDDY BEAR LINK????? WHY???? A teddy with a dildo is offensive? WTF???

 

 

Shoulda shown the one with the chainsaw & pump action shotgun..... that've got past the censors....

[Worker 11811]

I thought the picture was funny but I didn't show it to the Bears.

 

They would have thought everything was funny but the ersatz phallus.

There's one Bear, here, who would have made the comment, "Why is it so small?"

 

Oh, and the Bears don't see the humor in the pump shotgun, either. They'd rather use a semi-automatic.

[Guest]

"know we have teddy bear fans, but not those kinds of fans. Since stuffed animals are associated with childhood, that kind of pic is indirect borderline pedophelia."

 

I hope you are not serious. Maybe you didn't see the picture.

the teddy bear looks about 50 with beer gut and a a big grin and he is sharing a fag with the woman (also about 40) he has just F******. Where the hell does the pedophilia come in??????

 

 

 

next it will be banning girls in santa outfits with fur.

then it will be banning pics of girls in pink cowboy hats.

then it will be banning pics of barbie dolls in fur

then it will be banning pics of women eating chocolate

 

All because those things are associated with childhood.

then it will be banning pics of women because they can give birth to children so are associated with children.

 

This is bullshit. 100% .

 

Only a SICK mind could even think of that.

 

It is a f****** funny for goodness sake.

 

A teddy bear got laid. Not a kid.

[White Fox]

OK folks. Calm down!

 

We are real close to going way over board on this. Let's just move on. Yes, this one would put us in real bad light with our server!

 

From your posts here I am pretty sure that some of you have not seen this photo. Yes, it probably associates certain things. But no, that is not the reason it was taken down.

 

Not because the bear was an underage smoker either.

 

If you want to see the pix, then just ask TOS. Problem solved. If you don't then no problem. So there is no problem either way, right? Problem solved.

 

Let's leave it at that. Hey, it's too good a day to argue!

W

[LordTheNightKnight]

"know we have teddy bear fans, but not those kinds of fans. Since stuffed animals are associated with childhood, that kind of pic is indirect borderline pedophelia."

 

I hope you are not serious. Maybe you didn't see the picture.

the teddy bear looks about 50 with beer gut and a a big grin and he is sharing a fag with the woman (also about 40) he has just F******. Where the hell does the pedophilia come in??????

 

 

 

next it will be banning girls in santa outfits with fur.

then it will be banning pics of girls in pink cowboy hats.

then it will be banning pics of barbie dolls in fur

then it will be banning pics of women eating chocolate

 

All because those things are associated with childhood.

then it will be banning pics of women because they can give birth to children so are associated with children.

 

This is bullshit. 100% .

 

Only a SICK mind could even think of that.

 

It is a f****** funny for goodness sake.

 

A teddy bear got laid. Not a kid.

 

That's not what I meant. Despit adults having stuffed animals, it is still considered something children do. And adults with them are considered to have not (or are trying not to) grown up.

 

But even without that, images like that are impossible to disassociate from its use. That's the real problem. Either a grown woman is enjoying it, wich would seem to some like an erzatz form of bestiality (which we do NOT want on this site), or a young girl is using it, which is kiddy porn.

 

Again, just because the picture doesn't SHOW such things, does NOT mean it isn't implied. The reason is that some since we are visual people, we make associations with things we see. If a guy is putting on a flight suit, we usually assume the guy is about to fly something, unless something tells/shows us otherwise. If a girl dresses up in a costume, we assume she is getting ready for Halloween, a play, a Cristmas pageant, or whatevery the costume looks appropriate for, unless something tells/shows us otherwise. If you see a guy pointing a gun in a shooting alley, you assume the guy is getting some target practice, unless something tells/shows us otherwise.

 

Not all pictures are like that, but it's simple psychology. Therefore, if we see anyone, or anything, with a dildo/strap-on, and there is nothing else to tell us of another use, people are GOING to assume it is for one purpose, and that purpose is not appropriate to this site.

 

I'm not saying I don't get the joke, but it's still not for this kind of site.

[Mr Barguzin]

D H Lawrence made (roughly) the following statement at the Lady Chatterley trial:

 

"I write explicitly so that folks will know exactly what it is that I am describing rather than having them use their dirty little minds to fill in the blanks with their imaginings. Some minds are far more deviant than even mine."

 

[Guest]

 

I'm not saying I don't get the joke, but it's still not for this kind of site.

 

 

That kinda sums it all up really......

 

Here's one for you? A teddybear complete with strap on is banned but it's still ok to have pics of naked children in the gallery....... don't believe me.... go look... http://thefurden.com/cpgfd/displayimage.php?album=14&pos=15 are those pics sinister, no they're not (to normal types....!) & neither was the one which has jus been deleted......

 

C'mon ffs, Does the server have a Puritanical host or summit.....?

[Guest]

It does not bother me that the image was deleted for no fur content.

 

The picture involved two inanimate objects. A bear and a dildo. And a topless girl givivng a teddy bear a drag on a cigarette on a bed. It was hysterical. It was not even erotic; just a funny.

 

Anime is cartoon. On this basis is your artwork not the same? As you are associating cartoons which are for children with sexual fetish?

 

In sex play there is a lot of fun and imagination. Your assertion is not correct about the pilot.

 

I do not expect Furburger to expect Miss T to deliver him actual nursing do you?

Miss persephone is not a real nun....I am sory if that upsets you. Neither is ANY suggestion being made as to nun's sexual behaviour or identity.

 

Nor are the pictures of Miss T or Dita von Teese in graveyards any way suggestive of necrophilia.

 

Okay I can understand if you wanted to err on the side of caution or stop the link for no fur, but no way am I prepared to accept that this is in any way infered pedophilia. That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. So much so that I have shown the picture to about 25 people of both sexes who all laughed and said what is the world coming to.

 

EVERY porn site I have ever encountered is choc a block with girls in SCHOOL UNIFORM. What the hell is that about?

 

There are NO such pictures ever been linked here....fur is just NOT something that could ever be associated with pedophilia in my opinion.

 

Even the odd girls in school when I was a kid wearing fur didn't look that great. Their behaviour is not elegant; they are not the mature image we associate with fur.

 

If you start thinking like the puritans you enable them to rule.

[Guest]

Who knows?

Somethings are just ment for not everyone to know why.

[LordTheNightKnight]

It does not bother me that the image was deleted for no fur content.

 

The picture involved two inanimate objects. A bear and a dildo. And a topless girl givivng a teddy bear a drag on a cigarette on a bed. It was hysterical. It was not even erotic; just a funny.

 

Anime is cartoon. On this basis is your artwork not the same? As you are associating cartoons which are for children with sexual fetish?

 

In sex play there is a lot of fun and imagination. Your assertion is not correct about the pilot.

 

I do not expect Furburger to expect Miss T to deliver him actual nursing do you?

Miss persephone is not a real nun....I am sory if that upsets you. Neither is ANY suggestion being made as to nun's sexual behaviour or identity.

 

Nor are the pictures of Miss T or Dita von Teese in graveyards any way suggestive of necrophilia.

 

Okay I can understand if you wanted to err on the side of caution or stop the link for no fur, but no way am I prepared to accept that this is in any way infered pedophilia. That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. So much so that I have shown the picture to about 25 people of both sexes who all laughed and said what is the world coming to.

 

EVERY porn site I have ever encountered is choc a block with girls in SCHOOL UNIFORM. What the hell is that about?

 

There are NO such pictures ever been linked here....fur is just NOT something that could ever be associated with pedophilia in my opinion.

 

Even the odd girls in school when I was a kid wearing fur didn't look that great. Their behaviour is not elegant; they are not the mature image we associate with fur.

 

If you start thinking like the puritans you enable them to rule.

 

Assuming the girl is over 18, why didn't you mention that before? That would certainly negate any pedophilia notion I suggested, since there is clearly additional information in the picture letting us know a child is not involved.

 

Although it is still not for this site, so linking from photobucket or imageshack would be better.

[Guest]

It was just a funny for the half a dozen teddy bear colectors here lord; it was only posted in this thread because it was found in the same website as the good fur ons I was mentioning.

 

I did say she was about 40 didn't I?

 

I must admit because I cannot imagine how anyone could ever fancy a child that maybe I don't think of these things.

[MadameTR]

Just a couple of things to remember ...

 

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

 

You cannot define pornography but you will know it when you see it.

 

The joke about the psych patient who keeps describing the ink blots he sees in pornographic terms. When the shrink says, "You have a one-track mind," he replies with "Me??? You're the one with all the dirty pictures!"

 

There are three kinds of people on this planet: Those who can count and those who can't.

[LordTheNightKnight]

It was just a funny for the half a dozen teddy bear colectors here lord; it was only posted in this thread because it was found in the same website as the good fur ons I was mentioning.

 

I did say she was about 40 didn't I?

 

I must admit because I cannot imagine how anyone could ever fancy a child that maybe I don't think of these things.

 

Well since that link was deleted, you didn't mention where you posted it (I thought it was the gallery), nor what its full contents were, so that did cause confusion.

 

And if you just want to link to a pic like that again, at least do it in the denne pub, since it's for miscelaneous stuff, and a pic like that is certainly so.

[LordTheNightKnight]

Sorry for double posting, but I'm wondering if it was just the woman taking a drag, or if the bear was also. If a pic had the latter, the joke would have likely been more clear (like the auto pilot in Airplane!).