furslave Posted March 22, 2010 Share Posted March 22, 2010 Once again its not for the article but for the pics: http://www.randtpetsupply.com/cruel_celebrities_gallery.cfm http://www.examiner.com/x-1028-Pet-News-Examiner~y2009m2d2-Kim-Kardashian-I-have-NOT-given-up-wearing-fur (But in her case its a good news for us!) http://www.pursepage.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/catherinezetajones_dm.jpg http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3155/2546993105_3b4d4d5837_o.jpg not Kim: http://blog.themavenreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/mary_j_fur.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FurLoverinFL Posted March 22, 2010 Share Posted March 22, 2010 I would be honored to be enshrined in the 'cruel celebs gallery'! FLinFL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Worker 11811 Posted March 22, 2010 Share Posted March 22, 2010 Y'Know... Regardless of your message the first impression of your picture gallery is extremely important in getting your point across. If you have a sloppy looking gallery people are just going to click off to the next page without thinking about it. Those pictures are all arranged haphazardly. They are poorly cropped and exposed. Some of them aren't even displayed at the right aspect ratio. They are all stretched or squeezed. And, if you're trying to point the finger at somebody, why don't you put the name of the person you are talking about under the picture? Isn't that the whole point of having a "Wall of Shame?" The owner of that site is clearly a two-bit nobody. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
furslave Posted March 22, 2010 Author Share Posted March 22, 2010 Ouf! Worker, I thought you were talking about me! But i dont think you are, are you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Worker 11811 Posted March 22, 2010 Share Posted March 22, 2010 Oh, no! I'm not talking about you! I'm talking about that gallery page on your first link where the pictures of people who wear fur are posted in an effort to make a "Wall of Shame." http://www.randtpetsupply.com/cruel_celebrities_gallery.cfm The whole website looks like crud. The Wall of Shame page looks even worse. The captions are not under each picture. They are haphazardly arranged. Many of them are stretched or squeezed out of their original aspect ratio. Quite a few of them are poorly taken and poorly cropped. The page just goes on and on and doesn't add much to the whole website. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fur999 Posted March 23, 2010 Share Posted March 23, 2010 Added my two cents worth on the Examiner page, scroll down and you can do the same Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now