itsend Posted March 24, 2012 Share Posted March 24, 2012 From TMZ gossip site Kim Kardashian Did She Deserve a Dusting? http://www.tmz.com/2012/03/24/kim-kardashian-flour-fur/#.T23bn9VYN-w Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 24, 2012 Share Posted March 24, 2012 I just voted, The haters are wining. Come on people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Worker 11811 Posted March 24, 2012 Share Posted March 24, 2012 Hit your "back" button, reload the page and vote again. Vote early! Vote often! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shelley and kevin Posted March 27, 2012 Share Posted March 27, 2012 I did my duty and voted... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Fox Posted March 27, 2012 Share Posted March 27, 2012 I've voted a number of times too. Will take some dedicated posting to win this one with so many votes. But we CAN do it folks! With your help! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auzmink Posted March 27, 2012 Share Posted March 27, 2012 Me too, but like with anything, how many 'pro's ' are dedicated voters....as usual a flawed online vote system... Auzmink Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 27, 2012 Share Posted March 27, 2012 I was shocked to discover there are over 200,000 votes now. You would have to vote all day long to make a significant difference. I did find it interesting that PeTA as crazies is up at 66%. OFF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Worker 11811 Posted March 27, 2012 Share Posted March 27, 2012 1) Attacker should be prosecuted: 56 No / 44 Yes. 2) Flour bombing justified: 55 Yes / 45 No. 3) Right to wear fur: 67 Yes / 33 No. 4) Torturing animals is bad: 73 Yes / 27 No. 5) Outlaw fur: 57 Yes / 43 No. 6) Animal rights activists are: Crazy 54 / Noble 46. 7) Stop wearing fur: 69 Yes / 31 No. 8) Kim is more sympathetic: 90 No / 10 Yes. 9) Winner: 65 P∂TA / Kim 35. The results of this "poll" are weird: • They say the attacker should NOT be prosecuted but the attack was justified. • They uphold the right to wear fur but say that fur should be outlawed. • Animal rights activists are crazy but P∂TA is the winner. The results of six out of the nine questions invalidate each other. Two of the remaining questions are subjective: • "Kim=sympathetic?" could be easily interpreted as "I don't like Kim Kardashian" for any reason, not just fur. Personally, I think she's stupid. How many other people answered negatively because they think she's stupid, not because they like or dislike fur? • "Torturing animals=bad?" is so wide open to interpretation. There's no definition of "torture." It's also a leading question like "When did you stop beating your wife?" There's only one question left: "Stop wearing fur." In keeping with the bias of the article, obviously anti-fur from the start, who wouldn't vote negative on fur? The entire poll series is invalid as most polls are. It only took me about 0.68 seconds to figure that out. It's all a publicity stunt anyway. Why are all those people so stupid that they can't see that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now